Username: Save?
Password:
Home Forum Links Search Login Register*
    News: Keep The TechnoWorldInc.com Community Clean: Read Guidelines Here.
Recent Updates
[April 12, 2025, 01:54:20 PM]

[April 12, 2025, 01:54:20 PM]

[April 12, 2025, 01:54:20 PM]

[April 12, 2025, 01:54:20 PM]

[March 12, 2025, 03:05:30 PM]

[March 12, 2025, 03:05:30 PM]

[March 12, 2025, 03:05:30 PM]

[March 12, 2025, 03:05:30 PM]

[January 03, 2025, 03:29:12 PM]

[January 03, 2025, 03:29:12 PM]

[January 03, 2025, 03:29:12 PM]

[January 03, 2025, 03:29:12 PM]

[November 08, 2024, 04:31:03 PM]
Subscriptions
Get Latest Tech Updates For Free!
Resources
   Travelikers
   Funistan
   PrettyGalz
   Techlap
   FreeThemes
   Videsta
   Glamistan
   BachatMela
   GlamGalz
   Techzug
   Vidsage
   Funzug
   WorldHostInc
   Funfani
   FilmyMama
   Uploaded.Tech
   Netens
   Funotic
   FreeJobsInc
   FilesPark
Participate in the fastest growing Technical Encyclopedia! This website is 100% Free. Please register or login using the login box above if you have already registered. You will need to be logged in to reply, make new topics and to access all the areas. Registration is free! Click Here To Register.
+ Techno World Inc - The Best Technical Encyclopedia Online! » Forum » THE TECHNO CLUB [ TECHNOWORLDINC.COM ] » Techno News
 Google Trademarking – Moving Beyond the Brand
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Google Trademarking – Moving Beyond the Brand  (Read 470 times)
RealWire
TWI Hero
**********



Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 18530


View Profile Email
Google Trademarking – Moving Beyond the Brand
« Posted: May 21, 2008, 08:47:59 PM »


It has been nearly two weeks since the introduction of arguably the most material and controversial policy change for the UK and Irish paid search markets, and it has sparked outcry amongst brands.

•Teletext have threatened legal action on any company which bids on its trademarked name
•Lastminute.com and Auto Trader have considered legal action against Google
•Confusion is rife as companies decide which words to bid on or brands to bid against
•Reciprocal ‘gentlemen’s agreements’ are being made to afford a degree of protection to brand terms
•“Aggressive tactics” have been adopted so brands can pay their way in to win the minds of consumers looking for info on rivals

But have brands lost sight of the positive implications of the policy? Legal action is most likely a redundant exercise – this law is about levelling the playing field NOT starting a brand bidding war.

Up until now, brand owners, who have been able to buy cheaper ‘brand traffic’, have consequently used the brand to run PPC campaigns which deliver solid performance. From our perspective, however, PPC coverage should incorporate generic and product-related links as well as brand campaigns. The apparent success of these brand campaigns often mask the fact there are poor, or in some cases non-existent, generic and product campaigns.

With the trademark restrictions removed, it is open season on brand bidding with the prices (and volumes) set to rise. Brands get their traffic at lower cost to competitors due to the relevance of their sites and landing pages, but will probably struggle to achieve their former performance.

The overall impact of this - brand owners need to begin to look beyond the brand and focus on the real expertise required to deliver true multi-dimensional paid search campaigns.

This policy doesn’t mean curtains for your brand. There are a number of simple things that advertisers can do to help ensure this. For more insight into achieving a multi-dimensional Paid Search campaign and how brands need to adapt (or otherwise die!) to achieve maximum ROI.

Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Copyright © 2006-2023 TechnoWorldInc.com. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Page created in 0.128 seconds with 23 queries.