Username: Save?
Password:
Home Forum Links Search Members Login Register*
    News: Click Here to Join TechnoWorldInc Community on Orkut.
Search Site
Recent Updates
[Yesterday at 08:45:48 AM]

[Yesterday at 08:20:15 AM]

[Yesterday at 07:34:26 AM]

[Yesterday at 05:23:45 AM]

[May 23, 2013, 11:58:43 PM]

[May 23, 2013, 11:58:43 PM]

[May 23, 2013, 11:58:43 PM]

[May 23, 2013, 11:58:43 PM]

by Alex
[May 23, 2013, 11:58:41 PM]

by Alex
[May 23, 2013, 11:58:41 PM]

by Alex
[May 23, 2013, 11:58:41 PM]

by Alex
[May 23, 2013, 11:58:40 PM]

[May 23, 2013, 11:58:40 PM]
Subscriptions

Enter your E-mail :

Participate in the fastest growing Technical Encyclopedia! This website is 100% Free. Please register or login using the login box above if you have already registered. You will need to be logged in to reply, make new topics and to access all the areas. Registration is free! Click Here To Register.
+ Techno World Inc - The Best Technical Encyclopedia Online! » Forum » THE TECHNO CLUB [ TECHNOWORLDINC.COM ] » Techno News
 Could lower Windows sales be a good thing?
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Could lower Windows sales be a good thing?  (Read 236 times)
Alex
TWI Trendsetter
*********



Karma: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 9289


View Profile WWW
Could lower Windows sales be a good thing?
« Posted: July 20, 2012, 11:34:23 PM »

Could lower Windows sales be a good thing?
   


With lower Windows sales, some people think it's time for Microsoft to focus more on other products like Office and its Online Services Division, and even embrace other company's operating systems? Read more...


 

   

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/neowin-main/~3/PHanPd2F0Zk/could-lower-windows-sales-be-a-good-thing
   
Logged

TechnO wOrld InC - The Best Technical Encyclopedia Online!
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Add to Google Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Subscribe in Bloglines Add to Webwag
Copyright © 2006-2012 TechnoWorldInc.com. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Page created in 0.119 seconds with 23 queries.